Ukraine Military Deaths - Both Russia and Ukraine are clearly encouraged to ignore their losses for domestic and international propaganda purposes. But even countries not directly involved in the conflict do not want to emphasize the war losses of the allies.
Therefore, there is a tendency to emphasize (and even inflate) statistics that show the enemy in a bad light. "If he paints a bad picture of Ukraine, the US will play the numbers or talk about it obliquely," says military analyst Bill Roggio.
Ukraine Military Deaths
Source: static01.nyt.com
While we cannot verify the actual number of soldiers killed on either side of the Ukraine-Russia conflict, the estimates cited in the tweet and article do not match the numbers provided by Western intelligence services and senior officials.
‘Brutal Act Of War’
One of the most poignant and early images of the war in Ukraine was a dead Russian soldier, his face and body hidden in freshly fallen snow. The image, shot by New York Times photojournalist Tyler Hicks, captures the anonymity of more than 150,000 Russians sent to fight their neighbors and the anxiety of Russian families desperate for any information about their fate.
After weeks of denying plans to invade, Putin justified his actions in a televised speech early Thursday, saying the attack was necessary to protect civilians in eastern Ukraine, a claim Ukraine and its allies called a lie and a pretext for an invasion.
wider. . Ukrainians do not have a job problem. They mobilize or train/train up to 1 million dollars. Of course, the Russians may deploy more if they continue to raise conscription, but the Ukrainians are far from an enforcement problem.
This is also unlikely. Russia may have the theoretical manpower, but it cannot sustain heavy losses without victory without risking moral collapse and social unrest. They already have a problem "going forward". Of course, this does not mean that the losses are not tragic and desperate, but one Ukrainian soldier is worth a lot to Russia.
Fight against a notorious barbarian invader, the Force Multiplier, on your home soil. "The problem of Russian bodies is really big. There are thousands of them. Before the war, the weather was cold, it was good, but now we have problems because the Russians do not want to take the corpses," Andrusiv said.
Source: cdn-japantimes.com
“I don't really know what we will do with the bodies in the coming weeks. As for your first point, I said that this actually happens. As for your second question, the answer is also yes: Russian casualties are increasing faster now.
However, Ukraine is losing better-trained, more experienced soldiers, so even if the odds have shifted in Ukraine's favor, that doesn't necessarily mean the war is turning in their favor. However, given the dubious nature of the Russian market source, the inherent difficulty in measuring war victims, and the fact that the figures differ from more reliable sources, we can say that the claim has not been properly verified and should be viewed with great concern.
doubt . The Ukrainian government said the Russian military sent mobile crematoria to burn the dead. "Russian people are dying here, nobody is counting them, people are dying in this war. Do you know they brought a cremation chamber with them? They won't show their bodies to their families. They won't tell their mothers that
their children died here," President of Ukraine Vladimir Zelenskiy told reporters on March 3. In a video address late Saturday night, regional governor Vitaly Kim asked local residents to help collect the bodies and put them in bags as temperatures soared below freezing.
"We're not animals, are we?" he struggled with the population that had already lost a lot of their own in this war. I'm not sure the body count means much except when you can't get new bodies to start the fight.
So far, neither side has run out of bodies. What wins the war is logistics. In the US Civil War, as in all wars, the ability to provide weapons and war materials determined who ultimately won.
There are exceptions to the exclusion of public opinion, Vietnam and Afghanistan. But in the Ukraine war, the West can provide goods forever, Russia cannot. Ukraine may face massive destruction, but if its citizens choose to keep fighting, their supply lines will not weaken.
Source: www.aljazeera.com
On the Ukrainian side, there is a real lack of ammunition, again, according to themselves. Ukraine's deputy chief of military intelligence, Vadym Skibitsky, said Ukraine was consuming between 5,000 and 6,000 rounds of ammunition a day and had "almost exhausted" its stockpile of Soviet 152 mm standard shells.
It now relies on the NATO standard 155mm howitzer; it is not clear how many there are. NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg said that Russia's "brutal act of war" had broken the peace in Europe, joining a chorus of world leaders in condemning the attack, which could have caused many casualties, overthrowing the democratically elected government of Ukraine and destroying the country
a. Cold War Security Order. It's not the numbers that matter. This is the percentage of available strength lost. A Russian can lose 3 or 4 times more than the Ukrainians and still win. There is talk of mobilizing another 200,000 Russians.
There is a point where the Ukrainians do not have the numbers to defend the current line and must retreat. Similar to Grant's campaign in the East in 1864-65. If the war continues as a battle of attrition, the Russians win because they have more population and more equipment in storage.
This is why Western tank reserves are so important. This turns a conflict of attrition that favors Russia into one of maneuver that favors Ukraine. How can this become a maneuvering conflict when the Ukies are dug into concrete bunkers in places like Ugledar, Avdeevka and Artymovsk?
They're sitting ducks, so the Russian artillery knocks them into a zombie PTSD state, and then Wagner cleans them out. "There are somewhere close to 100,000 victims in Ukraine," said Dara Massicot, a senior policy researcher at RAND.
But the Russians "put the casualty figure around 100,000-130,000 (wounded and killed) - of which, conservatively, probably 20,000-25,000 were killed in action." Massicot believes that Milley "provided the best information available to the US government," but his Russian death toll is lower than US and Norwegian estimates.
Source: media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com
"In response to the rapidly escalating conflict in Ukraine, the WHO Regional Office for Europe reiterates its deep concern for the safety, health and well-being of all civilians affected by the crisis in the country and potentially beyond," the office said in a statement.
which warns everyone. further escalation could lead to a humanitarian catastrophe. However, they chose not to provide similar estimates for Ukraine, which could give the false impression that the Russians are doing worse. In fact, with artillery outnumbered 10 or 15 to one, according to the Ukrainians, it is likely that the invaders' casualties are now much lower because they can die at a greater distance against unseen defenders.
"It's part of a general pattern or picture that we've seen over the last month that Russia has completely lost momentum," he told Sky News during a visit to London. "However, we should not underestimate Russia, it still has capabilities. We've seen drones, we've seen missile attacks. It shows that Russia can still do a lot of damage."
A website created by Ukraine's Interior Ministry and a Telegram channel dedicated to Russian families posted a steady stream of photos of dead soldiers and captured young men, sometimes along with their identity cards. The site's name, 200rf.com, is a short name for Gruz-200, or Cargo-200, a military code word that came into use in the 1980s during the war in Afghanistan, which the Soviets used to mark the bodies of soldiers.
placed in zinc lined coffins for transport. Ukraine does not lack courage and determination. Western support is still there, as evidenced by the UK's announcement this week to deliver a handful (perhaps three) of multiple rocket launchers, even as Kiev almost immediately said it wanted many more.
But it is Russian forces who have found a way to push forward in the Donbass, raising questions about whether or not the three-month war is yet another turning point. Ukraine has not released reliable figures on its casualties, but officials have made it clear that the war in eastern Ukraine is becoming very dangerous for its forces as a barrage of Russian artillery has forced Ukrainians to abandon their positions.
A Russian airstrike on a building in Lisichansk, Luhansk, killed four people hiding there. Two more people died in nearby Severodonetsk after a day of Russian shelling. Another was killed when Ukrainian forces shelled the outskirts of the city of Donetsk.
Source: gdb.rferl.org
Four others were killed when Russian forces opened fire in Sadivska, in the northeastern region of Sumy. They won the Chechen war so decisively that only 20 years later the Chechens are fighting alongside the Russians.
And do you think Afghanistan has any lessons for this war? Russia now has a professional army supported by Wagner's forces, the Chechens, the Donetsk People's Militia. Five years ago, one of my wife's cousins was posted to the Russian army in Sakhalin.
He explained that the military is now a very prestigious gig in Russia and the men are highly motivated, paid and trained. Listen to this Australian Bakhmute interview about how well equipped the Russians are compared to the Ukrainians: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKZpYglZrW4 The whole hour long interview is worth listening to, but especially 5.21 - 8.15.
Throw cold water on almost every comment on this thread for the last 3 minutes. A US Department of Defense casualty report showed no US forces were killed in Ukraine, while the UK Ministry of Defense responded directly to the Russian market tweet, saying it was incorrect.
The situation is so depressing that combat-experienced foreigners who pass the entrance test for the International Legion may find themselves on the front lines less than a month after crossing the Ukrainian border. But again, the high accident rate that is now being openly debated may discourage newcomers in the future.
It is an extraordinary loss of life and ability for the defenders involved in the defense of the eastern city of Sievierodonetsk, which turned into a losing battle this week. But the city was, of course, a place from which Ukraine could retreat to the more protected Lysichansk across the River Siverskyi Donets, a defensive situation in which Ukraine fared better.
Nominally independent institutions are not very helpful either. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) provides the latest information on civilian casualties in Ukraine, but regularly underestimates the real numbers. in 2023 January 16 according to the data, the organization says 18,358 died, although it admits the actual number is "higher".
Source: worldcrunch.com
At the beginning of the "special military operation", Ukraine had more than 2,500 tanks. They were all destroyed by the Russians. Why should a hundred (or even more) different NATO tanks affect the outcome? The Russians will surely destroy them too.
At most, they can only delay Russia's victory. However, these tanks likely will not even reach the front until the end of the war - if then. Russia did not recognize the other assessments. British conservative magazine The Spectator in January 2023.
reported in an article published the last time the Russian Ministry of Defense commented on the army accident was in September; Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said 5,937 Russian soldiers had died since the conflict began. "This report is incorrect. No UK Armed Forces personnel have died in Ukraine," he said.
"UK personnel training the Ukrainian armed forces as part of Op Orbital left Ukraine in 2022. February. UK-led training for Ukrainian recruits is now taking place in the UK." Exactly how many Russian soldiers were killed in Ukraine remains a mystery.
The official Russian Defense Ministry line was 498 soldiers until Monday, when Komsomolskaya Pravda published a report that updated the death toll to 9,861. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told CNN Tuesday: "As for numbers, we agreed from the beginning that we do not disclose information.'
However, collecting and evaluating accurate casualty data is a fiendishly complex and difficult subject. I spoke with five prominent military analysts, some of whom did not want to be named because of the sensitivity of the subject. Most agreed that both Kristoffersen and
Milley probably underestimated Ukrainian casualties and overestimated Russian casualties, a constant feature of this war. "In total, we estimate [in addition to confirmed deaths] that at least 3,000 civilians died in besieged or contested cities due to lack of access to medical care and stress
on their health during hostilities," the head of the organization said. According to Matilda Bogner of the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine. to Russian President Vladimir Putin on February 24 when the invasion of Ukraine began, Mykolaiv was one of the first regional capitals
attacked. After storming the center of the city, the Ukrainian army chased the Russian army, leaving behind a trail of black combat vehicles and tanks. in their tracks. But the battle for the city, which is at the heart
by pushing Russia west along the coast The Black Number in the Odessa Stone is still ongoing and it is not clear for how long the Ukrainian forces will be able to sustain the offensive.
0 Comments